Talent Management

1. Introduction 

Gender pay gap has been prevailing problem in the 21s century and despite different types of measures taken by firms, government and other institutions, the gap is widening year by year and this report shades light on reasons behind that pay gap, possible consequences and recommends certain actions to overcome the problem. In addition to, the report also focuses on the talent management which is a vital part of strategic management, which is not only about recruitment but also includes the retention of talented individuals who are key to organizational success. (Chun and Evans, 2023). This report summarizes the main findings regarding various approaches to talent management mentioned, with the scope of leaning towards an inclusive management system instead based on the evaluation of the paper presented by Waschek (2021). In such a way, the organizations can make decisions to resolve the problems of talent management critically and create approaches that will work better with the organizational values, goals, and context.

Question 1

1.1 Reasons for the Widening Gap

The occupational segregation, which inevitably results in underrepresentation as well as predominance of women in low-paying job sectors or tasks, is most likely the main factor in women's lower pay (Kaliannan et al., 2023). Although women are the equal partners of men in their employments, some industries discriminated as female dominant or undervalued work as compared to the male-dominated ones (Pocztowski et al., 2020). Meanwhile, such a concentration of women in certain fields once more underlines the gender income gap in an unfair manner; women in these fields usually receive lower wages for equivalent skills as men in male-dominated industry.

In addition to that, gender pay difference is added on to motherhood pay gap. Women have to face the long interruptions or waiting hours in the job as caregiving is their prime duty especially after they become mothers (Chambers et al., 1998). Further, many women scale down their working hours due to caregiving responsibilities. Women are not the one who always bear the societal expectations which take care of their family and therefore get many career setbacks like being given fewer chances for advancement and income reduction (Campbell and Hirsh, 2013). Often, the struggle of women to try to cope with workload and family cares causes them to often neglect their career advancements in order to look after their children. This pushes the wage gap between men and women even further apart.

Implicit bias and discriminatory practices that have an enormous input into gender pay gap as well are the major things. As the law guarantees equal treatment in the workplace, gender inequality is fostered by underlying unconscious biases that influence the hiring process, promotional decisions, and pay scales (Whitehouse and Smith, 2020). The gender biases usually make women miss out on leadership roles or bring a situation where women are underpaid for similar positions and tasks while men are paid more for the same job profile and work competencies. Instead of the data coming directly from the salary reports, it is implied from the population that encounters biases related to gender (Velija, 2022). These assumptions make detection and management of the issue much harder, which prolongs the inequality between genders over time.

Among the issues that require accommodation such as job classification, motherhood penalty, and un-intentional biases, organizations must have comprehensive and progressive action plans (Morand et al., 2020). By assembly of such strategies and measures like targeted gender-focused recruitment to balance the gender spread in male-oriented fields, flexible working arrangements to assist employees with caregiving issues, and unconscious bias training for job choice managers and senior management, can be enabled (Came et al., 2020). These organizations will also succeed in tackling the root causes of the gender pay gap that contribute to the inequitable and discriminating work environment where employees, especially women, are prejudicially treated and given lower salaries instead of promotion based on their performance.

1.2 Consequences of the Widening Gap

The fact that the gender pay gap is increasing is by no way an issue of fairness; rather, it is a very critical issue for the economy as a whole. Economically, it does greater harm to women by discriminating based on gender which is prevalent in the working class in an unequal way (Ugarte and Rubery, 2021). When women earn less than men for the similar job, it is worse for their financial stability and affects their opportunity to the fullest in the society (Woodhams et al., 2022). This implies that the poor in the society will not realize their potential economic output hence will stifle growth and development which will effectively drive the stationary poverty and inequality.

In addition, firms that maintain gender salary gap are not only losing talented female employees; but, more importantly, they are perhaps creating stumbling blocks for men to tap into women skills, which are unique (Taherifar et al., 2021). Whenever women do not feel appreciated or underpaid they tend to look for more opportunistic employment offers and thus, in this way, talent pool is being drained out. The pool of talent draining may represent a barrier to innovation, efficiency fails to rise and the overall organizational performance is dropping, thus the end result would be financial loss (Sowa, 2021). Considering the fact that in the modern business environment which is dominated by innovation and companies often find themselves at a cross against rivals, the failure to utilize the intellectual property of all employees, whether they are male or female, may cause important business losses.

In general, enterprises with a sizeable gender wage gap are almost thought to jeopardize their meaningful reputation. Living in the social and issue-aware time companies, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders become demanding and wagging the finger at unnecessary or unethical should they are spotted (Velija, 2022). It does not take anyone to see the bad publicity surrounding a company known for having disparaging pay between genders might harm the brand image and shake the consumer's trust. It is in time of these challenges that companies may find a bit uneasy to avoid losing great employees, especially the millennial (Kaliannan et al., 2023). The customers can have innovative ways of rejection like boycott or negative labeling, which can easily affect the brand image and the sales (Whitehouse and Smith, 2020). In the age of global alliances' where a whisper carries all the way to the other side of the world in a matter of seconds, through social media and other net platforms, such image destruction can have an overwhelming effect, resulting to recruitment and employment, investor trust and public goodwill among another important things.

1.3 Recommendations Actions for HR Professionals

• Conduct the pay analysis that compare salaries by gender and correct the situation of the pay disparity (Campbell and Hirsh, 2013). Establish a principle of pay transparency by setting up pay system that will base the job roles, responsibilities, and qualifications as the yardstick of fairness.
• Create a work environment that embodies an inclusive culture where employees are recognized for what they bring to the company as a whole and they have equal chances for career development (Velija, 2022). Unconscious bias training to managers and decisions owners will be given for avoiding discriminatory practices during recruitment, promotion, and compensation.

Flexible work schedules, parental leave opportunities, and child care assistance programs need to be introduced to help employees with their care-giving role and hence reduce the economic costs for women (Pocztowski et al., 2020). It is crucial that the workplace favors work-life balance to the benefit of women and men treating this for what it is by reshaping gender pay gap and improving workers' satisfaction and retention. The HR function must work efficiently to address these basic issues and measures beforehand if gender pay gap is to at least to some extent lessened and the workplace becomes suitable for all employees regardless of their gender.

Question 2

2.1 Different Approaches to Talent Management

2.1.1 Inclusive Approach

Waschek, (2021) states that there are grounds for necessary inclusive talent management in the times of the staffing reshuffling that came after the COVID-19 outbreak. (Saleh and Atan, 2021). In the context of talent management challenges in the agricultural industry, as highlighted by Henkhaus et al. (2022), an organization like Bayer Crop Science, as an example, could take a stand of being inclusive and diverse. Bayer supports diversity and inclusion programs among its employees to promote a workplace environment that is friendly to every employee (Stein, 2021).

In addition, having inclusive talent management also contributes tremendously to stimulating innovation and, thus, business growth. A recent study by Schubert and Tavassoli, (2020) showed that companies that possess more diversified team management tend to beat their revenue by 19% through innovation (Zidny et al., 2020). 

2.1.2 Exclusive Approach 

While inclusive talent management practices prioritize involving a wide range of employees in talent processes, some organizations may opt for a more exclusive approach, focusing resources on identifying and developing a select group of high-potential individuals. This exclusive approach aims to optimize talent development investments by concentrating efforts on a targeted group of individuals deemed critical for the organization's success (Kaliannan et al., 2023). Although this strategy appears to be helpful and reliable from the technical point of view, it involves a number of pitfalls and challenges that must be weighed carefully.

When an organization tends to be talent-centric while focusing only on a few managers, they are likely to alienate other employees, the ones not members of the special group. Exclusion can come at the expense of developing a community of included professionals who are motivated, engaged, and promise to stay longer as part of the talent pool. Research by Sihotang (2021) indicates that discriminative policies often result in demotivation, increased turnover, and negative implications on the organizational culture and performance. Besides, an exclusive method may not be the best way to deal with talent management issues and the continuation of these inequalities within the organization (Anlesinya and Amponsah-Tawiah, 2020). 

Nevertheless, the fact that the best leaders can be selected based on their unprecedented qualities is beyond any doubt. However, in some cases, it is indispensable to stick exclusively to people who could be successors of very critical leadership positions (Campbell and Doshi, 2020). Organizations, in particular McKinsey & Company, known for its highly demanding hiring and promotional selection processes, are great examples of how selectively they operate their businesses. McKinsey, through its systematic search for prospective talents, plus building them progressively through structured classes and mentoring, is a high-caliber development. It may be possible to have a highly specialized and highly skilled McKinsey workforce because of its exclusive approach. However, there should be careful management to ensure inclusivity and avoidance of consequences, which can result in bad attitudes and diversity in the workforce (Nachmias et al., 2022). 

2.1.3 Focus on People Positions

Individuals may up-skill, irrespective of where they work, to make themselves more future-ready and job-safe. In this technique, talent management, together with personal development and career, is connected, which causes the consequence of this process: a well-motivated and fully engaged team that is ready to take on all challenges (Gallardo-Gallardo et al., 2020). Organizations that adopt a people-centric approach often make investments in training activities, mentorship opportunities, and career advancement pathways. Thus, they cultivate employees' potential and nurture their desire for excellence. One example where people-based talent management is seen can be an organization such as Google, where there is a more people-focused approach to talent management (MacKenzie, 2022). By placing impetus on the development of individuals and careers, Google keeps an engaged and innovative workforce, the powerhouse behind the company.

Referring to the skills gap issue discussed in the article, it is feasible to solve it in this way by using a people-focused approach. The deployment of staff training and career development programs involving the latest techniques and technologies may help an employee overcome their inability to meet future requirements (Goulart et al., 2022). In addition, when an organization comes up with avenues to develop both professional and personal growth and opportunities for advancement, it improves employee satisfaction and loyalty, which contributes to retaining talented employees in a competitive job environment that has high turnover rates (Lee and Liu, 2021). Through the integration of those two strategies, companies can build an environment in which employees' growth is not only defended but is also conducive to solving the industry’s broad issues (Al Doghan et al., 2022). This government's good effect can be the resilience of the workforce, which is able to tolerate uncertainty as they navigate future problem-solving ways effectively (Lewandowski, 2023). Therefore, a systematic evaluation of the company's distinct demands and its environment falls in the first place before the organization can implement a talent management strategy.

2.1.4 Position-Focused Approach

The position-focused approach to the talent management system places the emphasis on planning to develop workers who can be assigned specific roles or positions for the organization at the present frame (Lewandowski, 2023). However, the sense of urgent action accompanying these quick fixes can pose high threats and constraints that must be pondered upon by organizations.

Another primary risk of this approach is the possibility that such individual goals and potentials of staff are disregarded (Karam et al., 2020). It is because employees might experience a lack of engagement and honesty, which in turn leads to dissatisfaction, a decline in performance, and, ultimately, the employees leaving their positions. In addition, the prevailing practice of status-centeredness could not only maintain but also enhance a stagnation- and complacency-cultured organization (Buch, 2020). For businesses to act, impairing one's judgment in this regard leads to the situation where they will drop behind their colleagues and will not be able to adjust to changing markets and disruptive technologies. Agustian et al. (2023) claim that businesses that take the time to invest in employees' personal development and career progress tend to gain better engagement and commitment from employees and are able to reach sustainable growth in the long run.

The primary responsibility of personnel management in companies that have eliminated procedures, reporting lines, and position distance—which are crucial for operational efficiency and job specialization is to identify and fill critical positions at the appropriate times (Vrontis et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2022). Such approaches, however, cannot be the only source of development, and organizations should make sure that they support both individual growth and initiatives that develop personnel to take higher positions (Hongal and Kinange, 2020). Through the forms of a training and skill development grant, as well as a career advancement ladder, organizations can empower workers to do their best and contribute in a way that means something to the organizations' success.

3. Conclusion 

Through the analysis of the strategies mentioned above, companies will gain a helpful understanding of their personnel management policies and figure out the reasons behind the pay gap. Hence, pay analysis needs to be undertaken by gender to ensure that women get exactly same pay as compared to man and there should be inclusive environment and firms must provide all flexibilities and amenities that male employees avails from time to time. Furthermore, referring to talent management, it is critical to look towards the practice that involves the participation of all employees and, at the same time, pursuing the organizational goals and values. Even while companies are trying to induce changes in the strategic talent management field in the challenging business environment, they should be ready for an immediate commitment to grow the diverse and talented staff to make the company prosperous in the future.

References 

• Agustian, K., Pohan, A., Zen, A., Wiwin, W. and Malik, A.J., 2023. Human Resource Management Strategies in Achieving Competitive Advantage in Business Administration. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), pp.108-117.
• Al Doghan, M.A., Abdelwahed, N.A.A., Soomro, B.A. and Ali Alayis, M.M.H., 2022. Organizational environmental culture, environmental sustainability and performance: the mediating role of green HRM and green innovation. Sustainability, 14(12), p.7510.
• Anlesinya, A. and Amponsah-Tawiah, K., 2020. Towards a responsible talent management model. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(2/3), pp.279-303.
• Buch, A., 2020. People and practices in organizational learning. Forskning og forandring, 3(1), pp.70-88.
• Came, H., Badu, E., Ioane, J., Manson, L. and McCreanor, T., 2020. Ethnic (pay) disparities in public sector leadership from 2001-2016 in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 13(1), pp.70-85.
• Campbell, K.M. and Doshi, R., 2020. The coronavirus could reshape global order. Foreign Affairs, 18(3).
• Campbell, V. and Hirsh, W., 2013. Talent management: A four-step approach. Institute for Employment Studies.
• Chambers, E.G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S.M. and Michaels III, E.G., 1998. The war for talent. The McKinsey Quarterly, (3), p.44.
• Chun, E. and Evans, A., 2023. The new talent acquisition frontier: Integrating HR and diversity strategy in the private and public sectors and higher education. Taylor & Francis.
• Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Thunnissen, M. and Scullion, H., 2020. Talent management: context matters. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), pp.457-473.
• Goulart, V.G., Liboni, L.B. and Cezarino, L.O., 2022. Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(2), pp.118-127.
• Henkhaus, N.A., Busch, W., Chen, A., Colón‐Carmona, A., Cothran, M., Diaz, N., Dundore‐Arias, J.P., Gonzales, M., Hadziabdic, D., Hayes, R.A. and MacIntosh, G.C., 2022. Removing systemic barriers to equity, diversity, and inclusioninclusion: Report of the 2019 Plant Science Research Network workshop "Inclusivity in the Plant Sciences". Plant Direct, 6(8), p.e432.
• Hongal, P. and Kinange, U., 2020. A study on talent management and its impact on organization performance-an empirical review. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 10.
• Jiang, X., Zhong, S., Huang, C., Guo, X. and Zhao, J., 2022. Blessing or curse? The impacts of non-agricultural part-time work of the large farmer households on agricultural labor productivity. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(1), pp.26-48.
• Kaliannan, M., Darmalinggam, D., Dorasamy, M. and Abraham, M., 2023. Inclusive talent development as a key talent management approach: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), p.100926.
• Karam, S., Nagahi, M., Dayarathna, V.L., Ma, J., Jaradat, R. and Hamilton, M., 2020. Integrating systems thinking skills with multi-criteria decision-making technology to recruit employee candidates. Expert Systems with Applications, 160, p.113585.
• Lee, Y.S. and Liu, W.K., 2021. The moderating effects of employee benefits and job burnout among the employee loyalty, corporate culture and employee turnover. Universal Journal of Management, 9(2), pp.62-69.
• Lewandowski, R.A., 2023. Management Control in Hospitals: A Breakthrough Approach to Improving Performance and Efficiency. CRC Press.
• MacKenzie, C., 2022. Crisis, Risk and Human Resource Management. In The Emerald Handbook of Work, Workplaces and Disruptive Issues in HRM (pp. 435-455). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Morand, D., Merriman, K. and Deckop, J., 2020. Making sense of egalitarian pay: Reconceptualising its treatment in organisations. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), pp.180-197.
• Nachmias, S., Mitsakis, F., Aravopoulou, E., Rees, C.J. and Kouki, A., 2022. Line managers' perceptions of diversity management: insights from a social exchange theory perspective. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(2), pp.294-318.
• Pocztowski, A., Pauli, U. and Miś, A., 2020. Talent management in small and medium enterprises: Context, practices and outcomes. Routledge.
• Schubert, T. and Tavassoli, S., 2020. Product innovation and educational diversity in top and middle management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), pp.272-294.
• Sihotang, R., 2021. The effect of compensation, transformational leadership and organizational culture on employee turnover intensity. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 5(2), pp.132-139.
• Sowa, J., 2021. Voluntary turnover in public organisations. Research handbook on HRM in the public sector, pp.145-157.
• Stein, H.F., 2021. Listening deeply: An approach to understanding and consulting in organizational culture. Routledge.
• Taherifar, R., Holmes, M.J. and Hassan, G.M., 2021. Is Performance Affected by the CEO-employee Pay Gap?: Evidence from Australia. University of Waikato.
• Ugarte, S.M. and Rubery, J., 2021. Gender pay equity: Exploring the impact of formal, consistent and transparent human resource management practices and information. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), pp.242-258.
• Velija, P., 2022. A sociological analysis of the gender pay gap data in UK sport organisations. In Gender equity in UK sport leadership and governance (pp. 197-216). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A. and Trichina, E., 2022. Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review. The international journal of human resource management, 33(6), pp.1237-1266.
• Wang, Y., Hong, A., Li, X. and Gao, J., 2020. Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, 116, pp.214-220.
• Waschek, M., 2021. COVID-19 and Its Impact on Talent Management in Agribusiness. Croplife.
• Whitehouse, G. and Smith, M., 2020. Equal pay for work of equal value, wage-setting and the gender pay gap. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(4), pp.519-532.
• Woodhams, C., Trojanowski, G. and Wilkinson, K., 2022. Merit sticks to men: gender pay gaps and (In) equality at UK Russell Group Universities. Sex Roles, 86(9), pp.544-558.
• Zidny, R., Sjöström, J. and Eilks, I., 2020. A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), pp.145-185.