Physical-digital Play In Children With Send

[Student ID]

[Name of the Institution]

[Date of Submission]

Literature Review

1.1 Summary

The existing studies are extremely limited that are focus on the systematic review of physical-digital play in children with SEND. The few studies that are present in different data bases are contain extremely limited scope and considering the small sample size of to focus only on specific event like COVID-19. Therefore, the need of new study arise which focus on all aspects of study and examine the impact of games on people with SEND. The majority of the identified studies showed promising results; nevertheless, interpretations of the results were constrained by the research' quality and rigor. For single-case studies, prior assessments have similarly seen strong results and weak to moderate quality. Even though research on a wide range of peer interaction skills in children is encouraging, the results are very inconsistent and many of the research findings still need to be confirmed. The available data does not allow for a full definition of the features of peer interactions among children. 

Keywords: children with SEND, educational setting, games, physical play

1.2 Literature Review   

The first study included in this literature review is the systematic literature conducted by Topping et al. (2022) in which the focus of the researcher is to provide the information related to the educational games, “computer-supported cooperative learning (CSCL)”, and “computer-assisted instruction (CAI)”, which are primarily used in schools but may also be used outside of them. This systematic analysis looks at effectiveness research on blended and online learning from schools, which is especially pertinent in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, it can be observed that the scope of this systematic literature in narrowed to COVID times only. Comparatively, this systematic literature however, considers all the literature without bounding it to specific time. Furthermore, it can also note that the number of studies contain in this review is eight from different databases. Besides that, this study not only included more information but to include the additional data bases also which helps to improve the findings in terms of diverse nature of analysis. After removing studies that were not related to schools, published before 2000, were not in English, lacked data, or were duplicates, 1355 studies remained: 7% were online, 13% were blended, 7% were CSCL, 26% were games, and 47% were CAI. In 85% of the investigations, digital technology proved to be more successful than traditional training, with 8% showing no difference and 3% showing a decline. 

Self-efficacy and improved results were strongly correlated. The study's strengths and weaknesses were examined and connected to earlier studies, along with a critical analysis and a full discussion of the implications for future researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The potential for increased learner autonomy and task flexibility, which promotes higher self-regulation, may be the primary benefit of digital technology. 

Another systematic review that has been analysing in this study is Garde et al. (2016) in which the author emphasizes upon the overweight and obesity that are becoming major issues worldwide, and this is related to the rise in physical inactivity among youngsters. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a brand-new mobile game in an educational setting called Mobile Kids Monster Manor (MKMM). MKMM is a wirelessly connected accelerometer-based activity monitor that was created with feedback from young people to improve physical activity. In a randomized 4-week crossover research, 42 healthy students took part to assess the effectiveness of the gaming intervention. Baseline, washout, control/game intervention, and game intervention/control phases lasted for a week in each of the two research arms. Due to the fact that the study only focusses on the specific nature of game, the author might not get the actual outcomes related to the effects of games on children because of the limited sample size. To overcome this issue, this study has to analyse the multiple factors and games and its impact on the children with SEND. 

This systematic review finds that the rise in BMI z-score, MKMM produced a larger increase in steps and active minutes per day among children with a higher BMI z-score, according to a linear regression model. These increases were 14% and 10% higher, respectively, than baseline. MKMM improved steps and active minutes in an educational setting, to sum up. According to this, smartphone exercise apps may be helpful resources for educational institutions to encourage students to be physically active and fight teen obesity.

Using single-case research methodology by Barton et al. (2020), this study analysed the rigor and results of 27 objects play intervention studies in this systematic review. The current study looked at a number of descriptive features, such as materials, instructional packages, and settings, and concentrated on research involving kids who were 5 years old or younger. Along with examining several methodological aspects like quality, rigor, and visual analytic techniques, the researcher also examined how generalized play was facilitated and measured. The majority of the identified studies showed promising results; nevertheless, interpretations of the results were constrained by the research' quality and rigor. For single-case studies, prior assessments have similarly seen strong results and weak to moderate quality. Considering that other assessments of play intervention research have found high-quality group-design studies with strong outcomes, the study results should be interpreted cautiously. There should be more replications evaluating effective interventions utilizing single-case studies with strict methodological standards.   

Peer support networks that are emotionally supportive can help students connect with one another and participate in school, which is beneficial for kids and teenagers (Van Der Meulen et al., 2021). Establishing healthy relationships appears to be more challenging for children with “special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).” These students are also more susceptible to negative peer experiences, such as bullying and social isolation. Schools can benefit from systems where students can model helpful behaviour from one another in order to foster a friendly and upbeat environment. Emotional peer support is social engagement between peers through practical or emotional support based on shared experiences, often to the mutual advantage of both parties. The emotional peer support strategies for SEND students in schools were found by this systematic study. 

This research revealed primarily good results in terms of improved social acceptability and interaction, as well as improved self-worth and empathy at the individual level, for both peer supporters and focal students. Although more accurate data is needed to draw further conclusions, it was also seen that the pupils were becoming more bonded through friendship. Important elements influencing the effectiveness of peer support systems include family involvement, teacher specialization, and institutional support from the school. Due to the paucity of available data, it is advised that similar variables be included in further studies.

The findings of this study show that through activity ideas, intervention descriptions demonstrated students' active participation; however, their involvement in system organization was minimal. More study is required to determine how emotional peer support might enhance student-student interactions and how peers can actively participate in this assistance. 

To provide a general picture of the advantages and disadvantages that children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) face while interacting with other kids, the current review compiles studies on peer interaction abilities in kids with DLD (Lloyd-Esenkaya et al., 2020). The research on peer interaction strengths and challenges in kids with DLD was compiled through a systematic review. There were no time limits imposed, and the selection criteria took into consideration a large number of the diagnostic labels that were previously employed to identify DLD. English-speaking primary school students in the UK between the age of (4 to 11 years old) are the subjects of the studies included in this study. 28 papers that matched the inclusion criteria were found after a thorough database search. When engaging with peers, children diagnosed with DLD are shown to have numerous difficulties.

Research examining aspects of play behaviour like turn-taking and discourse characteristics like access behaviours have revealed challenges. The children's skills to form friendships, use verbal and nonverbal cues to collaborate with peers on decisions, and participate in social pretend play with peers are examples of their strengths in peer interaction; however, heterogeneity was also evident. Even though research on a wide range of peer interaction skills in children is encouraging, the results are very inconsistent and many of the research findings still need to be confirmed. The available data does not allow for a full definition of the features of peer interactions among children.

As a "level one" or "well-established" intervention for school-aged children and adolescents, “trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT)” is one of the most extensively researched and publicized treatments for “posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)” and other comorbid conditions (McGuire et al., 2021). The current systematic review looked at research on applying TF-CBT to preschool-aged children (those between the ages of three and six) as well as research on developmental strategies that may boost TF-CBT's effectiveness with this age group. 

Part of the evidence-based practice in psychology paradigm, data on TF-CBT use with preschool-aged children was taken from case studies, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and other empirical evidence sources. The effectiveness of TF-CBT for traumatized preschool-aged children has not been as well studied as it has when it comes to studies involving school-aged children and adults. Considering the limited number of published trials to date and the variations in treatment approaches utilized with preschool-aged children, TF-CBT seems to fit the description of a “level two” or “probably efficacious” intervention for this age group in particular. When considering the use of TF-CBT for preschool-aged children exhibiting signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, the literature suggests that factors such as language and cognitive ability, family setting, culture, and clinician expertise should be taken into consideration.

The amount of information and knowledge about the prevalence of mental health problems worldwide is increasing; these problems affect people for the rest of their lives and begin in half of cases before the age of 14 (García-Carrión et al., 2019). Many initiatives continue to focus on finding individual-level answers, despite the fact that this global crisis is multifaceted and necessitates holistic methods. The purpose of this work is to present a comprehensive analysis of the data supporting the beneficial impacts on children's and adolescents' mental health that come from community- and school-based treatments where interaction between various agents is a key element.

To find interventions where relationships between professionals, community, members, families, teachers, and peers or other played a part, a thorough search of electronic databases (Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, ERIC and SCOPUS) was done. Their impact on the mental health of kids and teenagers was also examined. A comprehensive analysis of articles released between 2007 and 2017 was conducted by us. Out of 384 studies, eleven satisfied the requirements for inclusion. Of the examined studies, seven concentrate on school-based treatments that foster positive relationships between kids, teachers, families, and mental health providers. Four of the publications create interventions that include community people interacting with kids and teens in a dialogic manner.

The interventions used in this research emphasize upon the role of different players in schools and communities that are helpful to build positive relationships between other stakeholders including children, parents, and the teachers. A reduction in affective symptoms and disruptive behaviours like anxiety and depression, along with an improvement in social skills and personal well-being, are some of the outcomes of the mental health interventions documented on the issues faced by children and adolescents. 

This research leads to the evidence of benefits of games on adults' and children's cognitive state, brightening emotional wellness and generating mental health disorders. Determination for further study is necessary as to establish the incorporation of different roles affected on the outcome of the interventions, although these roles comprised of managing part of the proceedings. This study undertaken by Komis et al. (2021) is an all-inclusive analysis of last 30 years' data associated with smart toys that target children at the early age group which ranges between 3-12 years. This research will determine and classify fifty publications on smart toys with the focus being on the technological and instructional affordances they offer. The results bring out that four basic technical affordances and their combined effects contributed into the design and development of the toy. The study examines the educational benefits of smart toys through various use cases and learning objectives that focus on identifying particular goals across various subjects and goals based on transversal competencies like problem solving, computational thinking, spatial thinking, symbolic thinking, and collaboration. 

Lastly, using a multiple correspondence analysis, the relationships between the distinct technological and educational affordances of smart toys are grouped together with the affordance progression according to the date of development. In conclusion, particular sciences (programming) and a few 21st-century abilities (STEM and computational thinking) have been impacted by smart toys in recent years. In contrast, transversal skills like problem solving, emotional intelligence, symbolic thinking, cooperation, and storytelling were given more attention in the first 20 years.

1.3 Aims and Objectives

The aim of this research is to explore the benefits and limitations associated with the use of physical-digital play to improve the learning and cognitive abilities of the patients with SEND. For such purposes, the following objectives will be carried out in overall systematic process.

  1. To analyse and identify the existing literature on the physical digital play in SEND children under the foundation of systematic literature review.
  2. To examine the benefits and limitations of physical digital play intervention to promote wellbeing and development of children with SEND.
  3. To explore the barriers and challenges linked with the implementation of the physical digital play at home and educational settings for children with SEND. 

 

  1. References 

  • Barton, E.E., Murray, R., O'Flaherty, C., Sweeney, E.M. and Gossett, S., 2020. Teaching object play to young children with disabilities: A systematic review of methods and rigor. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 125(1), pp.14-36.
  • Garde, A., Umedaly, A., Abulnaga, S.M., Junker, A., Chanoine, J.P., Johnson, M., Ansermino, J.M. and Dumont, G.A., 2016. Evaluation of a novel mobile exergame in a school-based environment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(3), pp.186-192.
  • Komis, V., Karachristos, C., Mourta, D., Sgoura, K., Misirli, A. and Jaillet, A., 2021. Smart toys in early childhood and primary education: A systematic review of technological and educational affordances. Applied Sciences, 11(18), p.8653.   
  • Lloyd-Esenkaya, V., Russell, A.J. and Clair, M.C.S., 2020. What are the peer interaction strengths and difficulties in children with developmental language disorder? A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), p.3140.
  • McGuire, A., Steele, R.G., and Singh, M.N., 2021. Systematic review on the application of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) for preschool-aged children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(1), pp.20-37.
  • Topping, K.J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D. and Ferguson, N., 2022. Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), p.e3353
  • Van Der Meulen, K., Granizo, L. and Del Barrio, C., 2021. Emotional peer support interventions for students with SEND: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, p.797913.
  1. Appendix

Proposal modules: Protocol for Systematic Review

(to be included in the main body of the assignment ie before the reference list)

For each section you should provide a description of the procedure and justification for why you have made these choices (ie a justification means you should include supporting references).

 

Section

Details relating to YOUR study design

 ie a description of the process and justification of your choices.

Study Design

In addition to stating that this will be a systematic review you should also identify the type of studies that will be included in the review

The research designs are basically classified into two primary categories that are quantitative research design and qualitative research design. A key difference is that qualitative research aims to gather an in-depth understanding of human behaviour and the reasons that govern such behaviour, while quantitative research aims to develop and employ mathematical models, theories and hypotheses pertaining to phenomena. Qualitative research asks broad, general questions to allow participants to explain their experiences, feelings, and perceptions. It may use interviews, focus groups, observations, and review of documents (Busetto et al. 2020). The sample sizes are typically small and non-random. The data analysis is subjective and interpretive, allowing themes to emerge. Quantitative research asks specific, narrow questions and collects numerical data from participants (Mohajan et al. 2020). It may use questionnaires, surveys, structured observations, and experiments with strict rules and procedures. The samples sizes are larger and random to get representative, generalizable results. The data analysis uses statistics and other procedures to quantify the data and test hypotheses. A qualitative approach works when little is known about an issue and detailed, complex information is needed to develop initial theories and hypotheses (Casula et al. 2021). A quantitative approach works to finalize theories, test hypotheses, and establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Qualitative research can inform quantitative studies, while quantitative studies can provide facts to support qualitative insights. Using both approaches together provides comprehensive knowledge about research problems than either approach alone (Dawadi et al. 2021). However, in this research qualitative research design will be applied which will help the researchers in extracting data regarding the chosen study topic and exploring the deep insights related to the chosen study variables. 

Aims & Objectives

Use the guidance in the Powerpoint presentation. 

There are 4 main areas to be addressed in your aims.

The aim of this research is to explore the benefits and limitations associated with the use of physical-digital play to improve the learning and cognitive abilities of the patients with SEND. For such purposes, the following objectives will be carried out in overall systematic process.

  1. To analyse and identify the existing literature on the physical digital play in SEND children under the foundation of systematic literature review.
  2. To examine the benefits and limitations of physical digital play intervention to promote wellbeing and development of children with SEND.
  3. To explore the barriers and challenges linked with the implementation of the physical digital play at home and educational settings for children with SEND. 



Focused question

State your focused question

Identify the PICO/PIO elements of your question

The research questions of this review are based on the below presented PICO framework:

P (Population/patients): UK children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND)

I (Intervention): Physical Digital play

C (Comparison): Digital play, Traditional play and physical play

O (Outcomes): wellbeing, social interaction, developmental improvement, and inclusion 

Based on the following aspects of the study, defined through the PICO framework, the below presented research questions will be focused:

  1. What is the effect of the physical digital play on the motor developmental skills and cognitive development of the UK children with SEND?
  2. How the traditional play, physical play does is compared with the benefits of the physical digital play among SEND children population? 













Structured search strategy


Must include a full description of the keywords used and how they will be combined.


Identify your search strategy 



Identify the databases that will be searched


Include details of limits to be applied


Include details of additional actions to ensure the search is comprehensive Eg searching reference lists


Include a PLAN of your search strategy AND a copy of the search carried out in one database (include both of these in the appendices


During this review, the search strategy will be consisted of criteria for the selection of the articles. The strategy for search will be the organized structure of search terms for databases like Medline, Cochrane Library and CINAHL whose search algorithm is different from Google Search Engine. The following table of selection criteria indicates the aspects that will be prioritised in the search strategy. Moreover, the PICO framework will be used to define the search aspects and it is represented in the screening process. PICO is a framework that comprises factors like Population/ patients, Intervention/ interest, and outcomes (Kloda et al. 2020). The PICO framework is a technique used to break down a research question into key components in order to facilitate the literature search process. The population refers to the particular group or demographic you are interested in studying. The intervention is the specific treatment, program, or exposure that is being investigated. The comparison is what the intervention is being compared against; this could be an alternative treatment, placebo, or standard/usual care. Finally, the outcomes refer to the specific results or consequences of the intervention that you aim to measure. Clearly defining these PICO elements helps structure a focused research question that can more effectively guide a systematic search of the academic literature (Kloda et al. 2020). The PICO framework enhances searching efficiency as it encourages the researcher to identify key concepts and terms for each element that can then be combined using Boolean operators to retrieve the most relevant articles (Bramer et al. 2018). Using PICO also helps researchers isolate high quality evidence that matches the specifics of their research question from the vast amount of literature available. Overall, the structured PICO approach facilitates an organized, comprehensive literature review centred on a well-defined research question. It is a widely used tool in research and mostly in literature-based studies to indicate the area of investigation. The search terms such as “physical-digital play” AND “Children” OR “Adolescents” OR “Teenagers” OR “Young individuals” AND “UK population” OR “UK” AND “SEND” OR “Special educational needs and disability” will be used to extract relevant literature and articles for data collection. 









Inclusion/exclusion criteria


State your inclusion/exclusion criteria and justify your choices

Screening will be conducted by the reviewer, identifying first potentially eligible titles/abstracts, followed by screening of full texts of selected studies against the above criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or referral to a third reviewer if needed. If relevant data cannot be extracted, study authors may be contacted. The study selection process will be documented in a PRISMA flow diagram. Reasons for exclusion will be recorded. Moreover, the selection criteria for this review will be based on the following Inclusion and exclusion criteria:

 

Inclusion 

Exclusion 

Population 

The articles related to the Special educational needs and disability patients in the UK will be prioritized in data extraction. 

Publications other than the country and disability will not be screened 

Intervention/issue 

The studies and findings regarding the physical-digital play will helps in addressing the research question 

The other healthcare practices and interventions to serve the children with SEND will not be focused 

Comparison 

The data related to the conventional methods that are used since last 5 years 

Interventions used before 5 years will not be compared with the physical-digital play

Outcome 

Physical-digital play will improve motor skills, social skills, communication, cognitive development, and emotional regulation in children with special needs and disabilities.

Other psychological aspects linked with the condition of SEND will not be assessed 

Study design 

The qualitative research study along with the inductive approach will be used 

Other research methods and approaches will not be included to conduct this systematic review 










Selection of articles for inclusion in the review.


Describe the stages of the process and who will undertake these


Include a copy of the tables modified to reflect YOUR study



Following stages will be covered to include relevant literature in the review:

1. Developing the research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria 

This initial stage will involves clearly defining the research question to be addressed and determining the inclusion and exclusion criteria that studies must meet to be included (e.g. study design, participants, and interventions). This provides focus and boundaries for the literature search.

2. Literature search

A rigorous, comprehensive search strategy will be developed to locate all relevant studies. Multiple literature databases (e.g. PubMed, Embase) will be searched using appropriate keywords and indexing terms. Searches may be supplemented by checking reference lists of eligible articles and using citation tracking to identify newer related studies.

  1. 3. Screening and selecting studies 

Articles will be retrieved from searches are screened by title, abstract and full text review against the pre-determined eligibility criteria. This systematic screening process will ultimately identify and selects the studies that will be included in the review. Screening is typically done independently by two reviewers with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements.

  1. Data extraction 

A standardized data extraction form will be used to record details from the selected studies. Those details will include study methodology, participant demographics, intervention details, as well as other outcomes of interest studied. The data extraction can be done by one reviewer and then additionally checked by another.

  1. Assessing study quality 

The selected research studies will be deeply analysed to establish their methodological quality and potential risk of bias using reliable tools, e.g., Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Quality assessment will be used to interpret and to draw correct conclusions from these studies.





Critical Appraisal


Identify an appropriate framework


Identify if a scoring or grading system will be used


Include a blank copy of the framework in the Appendices


Critical appraisal and analysis are the core features of the literature-based studies. It provides researchers with a general overview of the data collected to check for any possible bias or false results (Tod et al. 2022). The paper named as "Kyngäs et al., 2020" by the same author said that critical analysis and appraisal are the processes, where the investigators carefully evaluate the research to check its trustworthiness, relevance, and the possible moral and social issues in a certain context. The CASP checklist which systematically evaluates critical parameters along the line of research objectives, methodology and findings of the studies will be adopted by the researchers in this review. CASP method of critical appraising is the popular used method which is used to go through the process of sorting the questions and how to evaluate the information in order to increase critical thinking (Long et al. 2020). The analysis of the critical appraisal of the selected studies will be conducted before using he studies to be sure about their accuracy.







Data Extraction


Who will undertake the task


Include a copy of the Data Extraction form in the Appendices (modified/adapted for YOUR study)

The process of data extraction is linked with the selected research methodology and the nature of the research study (Mengist et al. 2020). This overall process is also called data charting. It provides a logical and systematic summary of the search results that correspond to the research questions. For extracting relevant data, the parameters of the chosen critical appraisal tool will be focused such as, the author and title of the publication, publication’s year, aim and objective, population, methodology and the selected intervention and the findings of the study were focused on this review. The data will be extracted from the selected studies which will be retrieved by following the search process and selection criteria. 









Data Analysis


Identify the data analysis


Narrative Synthesis  or Best Evidence Synthesis ie you will NOT do a meta-analysis

The analysis of data is recognised as one of the significant techniques which assist in applying tools for expounding the collected data. The data analysis tool differs as per the nature of the information collected. For instance, there would be different data analysis tools in qualitative research and different statistical tools in quantitative research. The rationale behind this is that the data analysis largely relies on the data nature and expected research outcomes. Since the research was based on a qualitative approach, therefore, the collected information was analysed through themes. The two main data analysis techniques are numerical and non-numerical data analysis approaches (Ivanovich, 2022). Quantitative data analysis relies on the use of statistical tools like STATA and SPSS software (Mehmetoglu and Jakobsen, 2022). Whereas qualitative data analysis includes content analysis and thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is a suitable approach to analyse qualitative information and provides a detailed understanding of the content and main objective. Thematic analysis is a data analysis technique that allows the researchers in searching a variety of data and understands the responses of the past literature related to the research topic (Braun and Clarke, 2022). Therefore, thematic analysis was the main technique to analyse the collected data. As per Braun and Clarke, (2021), the thematic analysis tool is effective as it assists the research in assessing the presence, meaning and association behind specific themes or words. Therefore, for evaluating the collected data regarding chosen topic, the thematic analysis tool will be used in which the findings of the chosen studies will be discussed and validated through the selected past literature. The thematic analysis is an effective technique to achieve the research aims and objectives with the assistance of the themes. The analysis tool is effective as it assists in determining the data as per the theme relevant to the analysis. These themes further assist in the development of ideas with the pattern of the data. 






Appendices


List the appendices to support your Protocol

  • Search strategy (table showing how you will combine your words)
  • Copy of your search from ONE database
  • Forms for selecting articles for inclusion in the review
  • Critical appraisal checklist
  • Data Extraction form

 

Custom Writing Services that Cover All Fields of Study

Need help with academic writing? We are right here! Cheap Essay Writing UK covers all fields of study, from STEM to humanities.

Prev sample
Next sample